Labour’s Tax Con

On 6 April, the rise in income tax that Gordon Brown announced in his 2007 Budget came into force.  This abolition on the 10 pence tax rate will disproportionately hit hard working families on low incomes and younger people at the start of their careers who are already faced with spiraling living costs and an impossible property ladder.  Many of the key people in the local community – waiters, shop assistants, cleaners – will see their tax rate effectively double overnight.

The Treasury has confirmed that 5.3 million families will lose out in total – even after the changes to tax credits are taken into account.  One in every five families will be worse off – by anything up to £464.  Part time female workers, often desperately trying to balance work and family life, will be the hardest hit.  In Hove & Portslade they earn an average of £10,500 (Source: National Office of Statistics - 2007).

Mike Weatherley, Conservative Prospective MP for Hove & Portslade commented:

“This is a total con by the Labour Government.  They claim that changes to child benefit and tax credits will compensate people but they don’t even begin to.  We live in a prime tourist destination with hotel and leisure industries that are vital to the local economy. Many of Brighton and Hove’s key workers will be an average of £200 a year worse off.  What is shameful is that these key workers will not see any improvements in public services as a result – they will simply pay more to support underperforming government departments.”

Hove MP Celia Barlow’s tactic of trying to convince some voters that she is against the budget changes whilst saying the opposite to other voters in highly irregular – and typical of Brown’s Labour government that continues to tax us at every opportunity. 

Mike Weatherley commentated:

Celia’s crocodile tears are too little too late.  She voted for the abolition of the 10 pence rate when it was first announced last year.  On her web site she says “I was pleased that this Budget is great news for pensioners, families and children in our area” and ”I support this responsible Budget”.  No mention at all to the abolition of the 10 pence rate.  Typically Ms Barlow has followed the Party line.  Ms Barlow also recently voted in favour of Post Office closures at Westminster whilst proclaiming to her constituents that she was against these closures in the press – this seems highly hypocritical”.

Conservatives have specific proposals to help hard-working families. We will oppose Labour’s plans to double the 10p tax rate; give people power through local referendums to stop large council tax rises; and raise the threshold for inheritance tax, taking 98 per cent of family homes out of it altogether.  Mike explains:

With the economy in such a mess, it would be irresponsible of the Conservatives to make rash and uncosted promises.  We will not do that.  Our proposals for inheritance tax and stamp duty will be funded by a £25,000 levy on those who register for non-domicile status.  The number of individuals registered as non doms in 2004-05 was 112,000. This was a 72% increase on the 65,000 three years previously in 2001-02 (or a 20% annual growth rate over three years), but only a 7% increase on the 105,000 in the previous year 2003-04 (Hansard 30 April 2007, Column 1383W; Reviewing the residence and domicile rules as they affect the taxation of individuals: a background paper, HM Treasury, April 2003; Hansard, 16 July 2007, Column 94).  To calculate the most conservative estimate of the number of individuals likely to be registered as non-domiciled in the tax year 2008-09, we extend the 7% growth rate above for four years, which gives a total of 150,000. Levy would simply be matched by an equivalent reduction in their US tax bill.

Extending the more likely 20% annual growth rate over the three years from 2001-02 to 2004-05 creates a higher estimate of about 230,000.  If all 150,000 pay a full rate of £25,000 then the Levy would raise £3.75 billion a year. Given that the average declared UK income of non-domiciled individuals is now in excess of £100,000, the vast majority will pay the Levy at the full rate. Because the Levy is set at around £25,000 we also expect that very few individuals will choose to become resident outside of the UK in order to avoid it.  Setting the Levy at around £25,000 strikes the right balance between ensuring that all UK residents pay their fair share towards our public services and maintaining the competitiveness of the UK as a location for high net worth individuals. The Levy will also remove a big question mark hanging over the City by safeguarding the concept of domicile. Investors and high net worth individuals would be able to locate in the UK without any fear that their non domicile status would be abolished.  Many of those registered as non-domiciled are US citizens who are taxed in the US on their worldwide income.

On her website Celia Barlow claims that the 'Tories'  have made over £10bn of tax pledges, and would put Britain’s economic success and stability at risk.  Responding to this Mike Weatherley said:

“It is a bit rich for Celia to say this.  Labour has taken us in the wrong direction and wasted tax revenues.  After the Northern Rock fiasco national debt stands at £537bn and Gordon Brown has broken his own fiscal rule – that National Debt should not exceed 40% of GDP (Office for National Statistics says the reclassification of Northern Rock as a Public Enterprise will put National Debt at 44.4% of GDP). Only Hungary, Pakistan and Egypt are the only three main countries with higher debts than Britain.  Gordon Brown proclaimed that he was the safe pair of hands for the economy – as it turns out he was just running up more and more debts on our behalf.  Under Labour the UK now ranks only 45th in the world for “extent and effect of taxation” (Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008).  Per person we have personal debts higher than all of our main competitors, including all of Europe and North America."

On Monday 28 April the Government’s budget is due to be voted on in the House of Commons. 

Mike Weatherley said:

“I welcome Celia Barlow’s reported comments criticising some of the Budget measures.  However, the fact remains that she has already voted in favour of the 10p tax band abolition last year.  Why didn’t she have the ‘courage’ 12 months ago – before public pressure - to voice concerns?  And when the crunch comes how will she vote? On Post Office closures she refused to support the Conservative motion to suspend closures. Come on Celia, do the decent thing, start voting as you speak and reverse the damage you did last year and vote against this inept and dithering Labour government and support the Conservatives’ amendments’.

22 April 2008

BACK